WebJul 8, 2024 · Obergefell v. Hodges is one of the most significant cases of the US Supreme Court, in which the Court ruled that marriage equality is a fundamental right of the citizens guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Issued June 26, 2015, the decision declares that all states are obliged to issue marriage certificates ... Web1 Citation: Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U.S. ___ (2015) Procedural History: The case began in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division The respondents appealed the decision against them from the lower court to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit; it reversed the judgment of the District Court The …
Search - Supreme Court of the United States
WebJun 26, 2015 · Let’s talk about the decision in Obergefell v. Hodges in Plain English. ... the husband of lead plaintiff Jim Obergefell, for example, has already died, and the children of same-sex couples are growing up without their parents being married. ... Recommended Citation: Amy Howe, In historic decision, Court strikes down state bans on same-sex ... WebJun 29, 2024 · In Obergefell v. Hodges, the U.S. Supreme Court held that states must recognize marriages between same-sex couples. The case was narrowly decided on a 5 … philo on smartcast
Obergefell v. Hodges - Wikipedia
• U.S. Supreme Court opinion in Obergefell v. Hodges (June 26, 2015) • U.S. Supreme Court official docket entry for Obergefell v. Hodges • SCOTUSblog official docket entry for Obergefell v. Hodges • U.S. Supreme Court oral arguments in Obergefell v. Hodges (April 28, 2015): Question 1 (audio and transcript) WebNonspecialists can use MLA style to cite legal sources in one of two ways: strict stickiness to the MLA arrangement template or adenine hybrid method incorporating one standard legal citation into the works-cited-list entry. WebApr 28, 2015 · Obergefell contends that Hodges cannot defend Ohio’s marriage-recognition laws under United States v. Windsor or under the applicable heightened scrutiny standard. However, Hodges counters that the Windsor ruling permits Ohio’s decision not to license out-of-state marriages and protects various rationales, such as local democracy. philo on the creation